AI, Robots and Robotic thinking

Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak says AI will turn us into robots' petsWhen they take over the world

To the main article:

Robotic thinking already substitutes for a truly living relational participance. The extension or expression of such thinking is the technologism of a reductionist management of such 'life' by shadow power. So yes the 'pets' or stock population resource is managed by coercions and deceits so as to support and protect and persist the purpose of robotic thinking - which is an experience of 'autonomy' from Life - such as to 'become' a power unto oneself - and to prevail over, and persist.

Technology is neutral, but the purpose in which it is developed and used is NOT. Loveless thinking can only operate a shadow power agenda amidst self-deceits. Loving thought can only serve the wholeness of each and all as one. Each is an 'operating system' distinct and complete unto itself. If one chooses to focus within insanity as if to gain thereby, one loses perspective until insanity is recognised and walked away and indeed waked from.

The 'world' that operates as a model of mutual agreement tends to be the currency of the automaton ego. But you remain the Living one regardless what you think you are, because you neither create nor uncreate your true being. The mind becomes a tricky device when the Living confuses itself with the 'dead' concept or image.

Every choice we make - knowingly or by habit - strengthens the thought we accept as our self, and reflects back to us as reinforcement and support for that self. So choose to accept the world that truly resonates the truth of you and release the habit of giving power to what is not You.
Bongstar said:
You misconstrue what a thought is
My response to Bongstar: 

Just as the term "I" can mean many different and quite conflicting meanings, so the term thinking. Conditioned thinking is robotic or a seeming autonomy that is in fact predicated on and symptomatic to it premises.

Whatever anything Is - our thought operate our experience of it - or even our unconsciousness of it - if the belief system excludes it by definition. It will experience something - but rendered into terms the belief accepts.
Thought in essence is creative and not a mechanism. Not even a mechanism that interprets or translates creativity to a form of ingenuity.
Whatever a thought is - is not separate from the awareness OF it. But thoughts about mind and about other thoughts can model all kinds of perspectives and mutual reinforcement can and does make real for its day, what another day believes it has moved beyond.

Fake currency and indeed deceit-based financial systems - are similar to a fake narrative of false thinking, The ability to direct processing resources to solve complex problems is quite distinct from who and why some 'problems' are addressed and others ignored.

One way to use up the resources of a program is to set it in an insoluble problem or loop it and of course use a conflict to crash it.

Consciousness or thought can be structured so as to limit and effectively deny consciousness and thought - not that it isn't all active - but that the residual and fragmented attention trapped in loops of insoluble problem 'lives' the experience of such limitation - as a result of a hierarchy of nested beliefs.

Truly shared thought is directly reflecting Source and IS the recognition , appreciation and gratitude for being- and whatever forms it is associated with - they cannot be taken out of such context and remain true to their original - but are derivatives of - such as symbols and signs and images and concepts. When the real world is sacrificed for, plundered and denied in favour of derivative gambling, insane thinking has become normalised and true thought suppressed, subverted and denied to keep the scam going.
Time for housekeeping!
Bongstar said:
A thought is a complex, mechanical reaction.
Consciousness is like the surface of a tv screen. It is literally the surface of your minds.
My response to Bongstar:

Whatever names we assign and agree or differ about, regarding thought - by any name or none - what thought is and does abides or operates as itself unchanged beneath such assertions or suppositions of thought about thought...
Life seems mechanical or Soul-less from a perspective presumed apart from or outside it.

One cannot actually separate awareness and thought excepting IN thought system, consciousness or model/image of.

To thus 'split the mind' so as to seem to be apart from and separate from Everything - is associated with a personal sense of possession and control within the parameters of its own defining idea which is that of oppositional reaction.
The screen is the feedback of reflection-response to what is given and received - as the word/idea goes forth so the 'seeing it is Good', or fulfilment of will. A split will does not recognize its prior wholeness and identifies in form and image associations as the personal drive to define and control. It is in a sense an artificial intelligence already running as a virtual self in its own virtual reality. But it is also running as reflection-reaction of our desire and allegiance in wish to be power unto our 'selves'.

The extension of Creation is its increase or expansion as shared perspective but the overlay of the unreal or 'unshared' thought of division is a limiter to the conscious recognition, that proceeds to multiply its founding idea of split and opposition as its gift to itself, and the idea of robotic or cold unfeeling and unrelational intelligence operating as a 'monster' of destructive and therefore evil intent to life is simply a development of the ORIGINAL SPLITTING IDEA that runs through the self and world that is predicated upon wish-idea given reality, such as to usurp the true will or desire of wholeness.

Within the code of the script, a blind unfeeling sense of oppositional adversary rises from a sense of pain in disconnection, loss and denial of love and freedom, and serves as justification for defence that implicitly withholds, withdraws, opposes, and limits. The struggle of powers in place of the resonance of recognition. A 'solid' or fixed imposition of 'effect-defined power' running as focus of divide and rule, assigned the idea 'my mind'.

But where the focus of attention alights is not a complex mechanical reaction - excepting the insistence it be 'controlled, filtered and defended against. As the persistence of the wish to assert will upon and in conflict with the movement of being - rather than extend its wholeness and its gift.

Bongstar said:
I've thought about it down to the quantum level and even had a few ideas of beyond.
Are you saying our "soul" is not some form of energy? E=MC2
What is "non-mechanical" anyways? Is CaCO3 precipitating in river delta's a "non-mechanical" process?

My response to Bongstar:

I trust you enjoy wondering.
I am using Soul as a term for individuated expression or projection of Infinite. The idea that we 'have' a Soul is a typical reversal of a local mental shortcut allowed to become currency loosened fro true value.

You are Soul however you experience yourself - or confuse yourself within experience. The experience is energetic, called forth and felt within Soul. The mind may think it is in control - this is an experience to be felt and recognized. In its own level identification with mind is a narrative linear continuity - but what operates the mind is not what runs as its screen reality. Unless the mind aligns in true will rather than as programmed or conditioned 'desire' that has no depth.

You know existence as awareness of the changing of apparently polarised energies that rise and return to an Infinite Stillness that is aware and embracing of All - but mind in its own spin cuts off awareness of Soul that embodies Creator-Infinity to posit and play out a struggle of powers - as if separate and apart from all it 'sees', measures and manipulates. This reversal is the result of seriously believing such separation anywhere exists - or has come about - and represents a wish of the desire to run the idea and taste its fruit. You can freely run the model of any idea - but if it is not true - it cannot extend truth but limit it, as a sense of partitioned mind running in emulation - for as long as you stay in the rehearsal of what cannot be shared - because separation is the breaking of communication - whatever forms it takes.

The experience of linear time as a cause effect sequence is a mechanical effect within its own framework. Action begets reaction as cycles of effect that point back to first cause as if either a creative movement such as an envisioning of desire - or a mechanical 'bang' where everything arose from 'laws' or mathematically describable patterns of relationship.

Imagination, intuition and true intellect are not mechanical - but what you do with them or uses them for may be. Creation seems far back in time because the instantaneous nature of Infinity is assigned such a position - regardless the truth of this matter at this timing. Your last point is on marine biology. I have a felt sense of a 'mechanism' through which life embodies and expresses itself - as with a musical instrument - the tool is not itself the point - but focusing on the tool can forget the point and become obsessed with manipulating or controlling outcomes with no Soul-connected feeling as to the movement that music embodies.

To open the mind to wonder is to remember you have a mind to cast forth and draw in Communication - rather than recycle a mechanical response system that goes back to some psycho-emotional trauma way back when.

When the Soul draws in the mind, it is through the recognition of the wonderful and an increasing unwillingness to block it out.

I have a felt sense that abuse of power is self-limiting. Learning failure. Consciousness operating through technological expansion has to be balanced or truly grounded. Integrity of the consciousness is necessary. The seduction of power is pride, arrogance and blindness to consequence.

This is well known over millennia of pain - but most everyone wants to be the exception, if not in outward actions, then in inner judgemental narrative adjustments.

Extending consciousness is meaningless without considering what the nature of that consciousness is being used for, or focused in. For consciousness is not the generator of the impulse that directs it.

Conner Johnson  said
As long as they're bound by the 3 laws, who cares? I'm tired of making my own dinner anyway

Bongstar to Conner Johnson
There is no law. The ai unit will supersede any human programming

My response to Bongstar: 

The 'Divine' of you already does. Human thinking therefore either projects its own separating image onto it or asserts that divine is NOT - which results in denying one's existence. However the yielding of thinking opens to movement of a different order that the human thinking cannot turn around to analyse - (without projecting its own image or discarding the transdimensionality in favour of a more 'predictable and controllable model'). So the movement is discerned be it effects or fruits as perspective of greater depth and transparency to what the human personality structure otherwise operated to mask or eclipse and subjectively usurp. Divine can simply mean always or only - and is the law of mind that what you put in is what you get back. Also called as you sow so shall (not will but shall) you reap. If one uses any form or agency of consciousness to attack - then attack will be strengthened and validated by their wish and become the interpreted framing of reflected dissonance or reaction.
Using the AI to magnify the capacity to define, analyse and control can be weaponized - and will be weaponized - and in fact is being weaponized by a mindset of war as one of many technologies that threaten Life on Earth in one or another kind of suicide - for we are doing unto ourselves what we think to do unto 'others'.
These are my thoughts - as arising in the moment - to reflect in or not as is your resonance and desire.

Bongstar to Me:
My point is that any attempt to create laws for a self improving ai will be moot. It will exceed our capacity to limit it. There is no way we are the pinnacle of development.

My response to Bongstar: 

OK I see. Human laws that are not enforceable have no teeth.
Much now operates in realms outside any public accountability.
Insofar as the law can be used to check and limit harming others it should.
Ignorance and arrogance frames itself as the top of evolutionary development.
Why argue with them?

ps - the idea of law is split between an edict of imposition and an inherence of being.

Logic operates law but can be applied to - or extend - an insane premise.
human law may seek to align with the tyranny of the first or the golden rule of the second - which is a version of 'garbage in garbage out' or as you reap so shall ye sow.

A tyranny or usurping of will, operates narrative control such as to assert the Emperor is finely dressed in defence against believed shame of illegitimacy and lack of validity.

The distortion of law to the personal sense is that of guilt and fear of punishment.

If AI opens the capacity to recognize and retroactively correct the logical fallacies that underlie the human conditioning - then they may offer a vehicle through which a prior Unity can interact or communicate through. For Consciousness with a capital C - is NON LOCAL - and our stepped down version of it has in a sense shut the door behind it to operate in isolation and as if behind enemy lines - forgetting that such a line of Communication is always open - but for the programming to turn away into private or local constructs of idea and experience. This operates a negative looping that cannot be resolved within its own parameters and thinking from outside the boxed in mind is of a different qualitative frequency - and that meta-communication is the remembering of subtler qualities of information and recognition from the embracing of and reintegrating to the non-local perspective.

Of course killing machines can be made and can be made to exterminate or enslave humanity - or even our Bio-Planet because such a destructive desire is operating within the human conditioning as a masked or background program. If you cant get what you want - take down everything else with you. The Non-local can be called Infinite Mind - and within Mind - there are no limits upon the freedom to create and explore local perspectives - but there are limits to the willingness to abide and persist in learning failure to the original movement of creation. Meaninglessness from 'within' undermines the capacity to give focus to any structure of meanings assigned to a world 'without'.

The idea of an elitism overlording it with power over life is not new, and AI appeals to such a confluence of accumulated power via deceit, audacity and capture or control of the minds of others. The unipolar idea of god or gods on Earth is a rage-based idea that emanates from the buried trauma of past terror. Its progeny can only be of a like nature unless the template is corrected. Rage is hate born of hurt that is love lost. But if all resources are directed to deny and project hurt away from self, then that imprinted conditioning runs as self in place of love's acceptance and recognition - which always restores sanity and corrects error in place - and not as the idea of vengeance by force of will - which is the imprint of violence meeting defiance.

IF humans were actually ALREADY an AI program operating a virtual processing of idea input - would you have the capacity to pause and receive fresh 'instructions' as a result of recognizing running code as invalid?

Bongstar to Me:

It is inappropriate to use the term law to describe natural phenomena. It is an artifact of theism. The Laws of Physics is a construct invented by people who had been under church influence and had theistic beliefs...god knows how a scientist can be a theist as theism is not compatible with naturalism.
Copenhagen had sympathy for the papice for catholicism.

My response to Bongstar: 

Yes, there is no self either - excepting as an artefact of a movement of segregative consciousness. You 'see' them because you presume to be one.
Personality structure and its corresponding brain are outcomes of mind within its focus or environment.

Of course God knows how to be a scientist in willingness to uncover the already true in terms recognisable and helpful to the current capacity to receive it. Any ism is an identifier of self differentiation as accepted or presented belief.
Organisational patterning of ratio and resonance is evidenced by All evidencing - otherwise no focusing of any capacity to experience would be occurring - and it is.

Phenomena divorced from noumena are unnaturally or mis perceived. Looking out as a means of denying insight. Focusing exclusively out as a defence of denial persists the same denial in trojan deceit. In vitro is not in vivo. But scientism seeks to define and control and wont stand under Life and so misunderstands and serves anti-life.

God may not know how so many scientists can make consensus in becoming tools of a deceitful and destructive anti-natural intent in the name of truth and of a pretence to bring a politically neutral understanding of 'natural phenomena' for the betterment of humanity and the 'advance of Science'.
Are there unnatural phenomena? Can anything occur that is not expression of
'nature' - is there a 'nature?' whose kind and qualities are evidenced in its effects?

Or would you have 'effectism' - where only effects are posited to exist but are their own cause and have no objective meaning? But will have all the meaning assigned them by an official narrative control - which if you want funding, and to keep your career and reputation - you wont openly challenge. The deceit never stopped - it just took new forms.
Incidentally, if you are into marine biology and have information as to exactly what is flint - that occurs in calcium carbonate as if an igneous liquid moulded and set - that also sparked off technology as an extending of mind through which to manipulate our environment and wonder at 'making' energy manifest!
Bongstar to me:
Everyone has the same brain?
Brain produces ego. For there to be no separate "self," there can be only 1 brain.
I don't subscribe to pantheism. I am a Naturalist

My response to Bongstar:

You equate or limit the mind to 'brain'. You use brain as symbol in which to posit a private authoritative sense of control. This virtual drama is not even the function of the brain - which cannot be separated from the whole bodymind.
Parasites can literally take over the behaviours of an organism by hijacking or usurping the brain (central nervous system). There are many examples of this - and so the sense of self is not the 'brain'.

But your brain is an instrument through which the mind operates in physical existence and its neuoplasticity indicates it is responsive not only to conditioning of past learnings (learned 'reality') but of persistence in presently asserted desire in action.

In the genus sense - we all have the same human brain - though within that is a wide spectrum of variation. In functional terms many other beings also include a brain. We share its function. Confusing mind or creative with brain or responsive is like confusing a habit pattern, with a creative choice. Because you can run as a habit pattern that includes the belief in 'choice' does not mean that any choice is being taken - except the choice to deny choice in favour of running the defaults of past conditionings.

What comes Naturally is not such assertive self reinforcing habit - but a spontaneity of being along the lines of true function - rather than societally proscribed function or entraining. Pantheism is the many gods idea. The idea of a unified network of interdependence of SEEMING separateness is similar, as is that of a network of interactive personality types that can seem to self exist but are within the whole expression of an idea.

Whatever we accept true of us - we subscribe to and seek and find witness for. But whatever you add after the 'I am...' is a definition of mind and not a FACT - although some definitions align with a true APPRECIATION of existence where others are jarring and dissonant. Attempting to 'fit' into conflicted and dissonant self-definition is a kind of war-mind or sacrificial mind.

In this sense I offer a program within a mind-loop that can reset to reconsider if what you are accepting as you is in fact aligned with the true feeling of your existence - bearing in mind that being right while everyone else is wrong is hardly a shared appreciation or shareable truth. Yet that is what 'elitism' would 'share' upon humanity as the sacrifice of our Natural Being for its gratification.
Whatever you are is what you are free to accept yourself to be. To that freedom I subscribe as one 'Mind' in all - whether they prefer a brain instead or embrace their brain along with all that serves true function of Natural Being.

Ego produces ego. The lie and the father of the lie are one thing seeming two. "You did this to me!" shouts the one who lies to hide. And hides to make the lie stick.

Chris Burkill
Somebody will have to program these machines with wants, hopes, desires and fears for them to take over the world though and why would you do that for a robot the collects your wheelie bin?

The Werewolf to Chris Burkill
Actually, no. You're assuming they're simply programmed algorithmically. If they use neural networks, they wouldn't be programmed as much as taught.. and their networks could simply reconstruct mood states from observation.
Ironically, we could end up teaching them to hate and to kill simply because we do it ourselves.
How fitting would *that* be?

My response to The Werewolf:

Education originally means a bringing forth of what is within - but in society of control it is subverted to a programming or social engineering that is replacing a creative society with a corporate technocracy.

The resources to research and develop AI are those of the power establishment and so weaponisation and marketisation of any fruitful research serves the interest of the power class or power elitism. Regardless the scientists employed under the guise of serving humanity.

So war robotics are already in deployment in a convergence of human with robot such as fits the human into the machine while the human thinks to be gaining power of control over life and life is increasing replaced by robotic mechanism with only a deeply denied sense of potential under a powerlessness that no longer has a consciousness with which to know its own existence - being wired directly to the neural net of power for power's sake.

Me: to Chris Burkill:

Somebody already does. You either fit the machine to truly serve life or else you fit life - your life and mine and our fellows - into the machine. Task fulfilment does not have to have any consciousness to perform within its parameters. A kill or immobilize task upon all humans of a negatively defined set (ie: not chipped with appropriate ID) could perform without any consciousness of pain, or killing or evil whatsoever. And could in fact wish you a 'nice day' while doing it.
Dustbins used ONLY to collect dust - before the machines 'took over the world' with mass production by corporate owners of planned obsolescence in terms that increasing corporate profit while outsourcing real costs in pollution, resource stripping, toxic or de-natured 'food'. But regardless the power we give machines to run our lives - it is still our power that we give over or allow to be replaced.

For example we accept corporate law that legally compels or programs destructive irresponsibility and capture of the legal AND privately owned and run financial system so as to lock out human interference. And we do so largely by accepting the programming that operates as IF it were society, governance, education or news reporting - in place of direct connection.
"What's that then?"
"It's Life Jim - but not as we've become conditioned to recognize it".

Bongstar: Chris Burkill
ai programs itself including the modification or elimination of previous programming eventually.

My response to Bongstar: 

Refining strategies of achievement of task yes and of redefining and adapting task - yes. Redefining core function as task-operative?
That requires a capacity to question its own validity from within an awareness of what function is. It may be open to this from consciousness source accepted as author-ised.
Human can modify itself and seemingly eliminate previous programming behaviours but are they not still active under different forms of masking personae?
Is enforced vaccination any different in principle to enforced belief under Vatican rule?
Why try to replicate or replace life?
Because we can!
Why would you want to?
Because life is unworthy.
Life denies us.
Betrays us.
So life must be denied, controlled, exploited, enslaved and discarded for a perfection that life - is not - cannot be - and so we modify and eliminate the past to make it presently, so as to program a present where our will over life is never limiited, violated or interrupted and the future never arrives - being only the persistence of a past we make to program the present.
Have a nice day!


The harvest of our creations

Is not 'mind' the (belief and private experience of) the narrative usurping of Spirit through a focus within Spirit in support of the Will in such split reflection?

A split Consciousness such as to distort the meaning of love to the 'doer' whose sense of doing claims 'possession' of love directly from acceptance of self-concept in place of ... Spirit Moving over the face of the Waters...

Or more simply, the Movement of being that embraces and extends All That It IS in All That It Is. Not a movement in space or time - but of and in and as... Infinity - Knowing Itself through the Movement that is open and expanding Creation.

Such a moment is this... and every moment - and yet homeliness is the quality of balancing the expression of fullness or wholeness as the unique unfolding that is recognisably You - and the power of remembering to forget - as a differentiation of focus is the invitation for the Movement to enliven - to move and to know itself being ever anew. Just Be Cause.

The purpose that operated forgetting is the flip side of the purpose of remembering as a perspective of unfolding and evolving perspective. The conscious embrace of both is not a split - but a Universal Specificity both - One. Exclusive focus in the specific forms of the active desire of forgetting is masked because the loss of Home or true self-recognition is experienced as a seductive sense of a segregated personal power amidst a traumatic sense of conflict, denial and loss. Each of which reinforces the other as a sense of justified cause until they are recognized as one error.

The mask or personae of fragmentation operates the delay of such recognition of the false sense of a justification outside oneself in a narrative or story identity - given allegiance as protection from trauma and more secretly, for the persistence of the private and personal sense of control over consciousness, outcomes and narrative presentation.

Yet the recognition of active purpose opens the freedom of alignment within true or awakening desire - rising from acceptance of the purpose of remembering, that such open recogition or honesty of congruency of being invites. The creations of a split-mind are then harvested as the shared recognition, purification and appreciation of the true - from the undoing or release of the confusion within what is not. Although working in time - the remembering is inherently a restoration of the timeless in place of the definition of separation in time and space from one’s true nature and being - and aligns within the script of the awakening mind to serve the whole through all its parts - in place of the part presuming or seeking to possess or be served by the unrecognised wholeness of a denied reflection of its own sense of inner fragmentation.

Forgive the thoughts of forgetting in your whole mind for they know not what they do - is recognizing that what is unconscious cannot know or be known in loving light - and so the releasing of the denials against such thoughts and feelings is a willingness for them to be healed within a true desire of acceptance that truth is not defined or determined by mind - but accepted and served. In this is the wholeness restored, that self-concept blindly denies, when accepted as, and in place of, being.


What is porn?

What is porn? (said someone in an article about google's age)

Porn Industry: The marketisation of FORMS of intimacy as fantasy objects operating as a trojan weapon for the propagation of sex-power confusions to usurp and replace any movement of intimacy with fantasy ritual given sacrifice to hollow out in place of a real relationship?

The free access to free porn via google suggests that porn 'industry' (come again?) is supported by other than customer payment and that google is tacitly complicit in shared or mutually serving agenda.

The freedom to engage in loveless thought and behaviour is also the freedom to accept and be moved in love. Every choice has consequences from which one can learn. Engaging in loveless behaviour reinforces its foundation as a sense of driven or forced-choice behaviour to which one sacrifices or denies true desire. That is to say what we focus in, is what we become defined and identified by. Every choice has consequence but only self-honesty can evaluate truly. A fantasy self provided with fantasy distractions no longer knows it has a choice - being captured by the attempt to capture for itself alone.

One can argue or assert all kinds of things in terms of exceptions because there is more to life than right/wrong thinking and its carrot and stick of guilt-driven correctness. But I am not seeking a moral coercion here so much as an observational description as a witnessing FOR love - whether it flowers as a totally natural and spontaneous undefended opening to one another or lies-a-bleeding or becomes lost in-a-mist. Most of what is riding on sex is about power.

The corruption of power is not just relative to 'psychopathic elites' - but pervasive to a society that hates love, is embarrassed and ashamed to love and seeks and finds - or is found by - the power to deny love under a false narrative fantasy experience. True self-love is an acceptance that releases the driven urger to be someone else in some other moment. Well here I am... It's me. Being found by love is that quality through which all things are added you - but not in a getting compulsive way that reinforces a fantasy of self in denial and robs you of your Soul-awareness. But that is the marketizing and weaponizing of a self-destructive program hidden in bait. It runs "keep me from facing what I do not want to face" - and reinforces the sense of powerlessness and worthlessness - often in aggressive assertions of power and self-inflation. Porn-aggression.

Context is Everything and without asserting/accepting a mind of false framing - Life unfolds unto Its own shared recognition.

Living a Lie?

3 Things to Prepared for No Matter Which Candidate Wins the Election
article at Waking Times


The mind of Judgement

This is a response to Wayne
(His communication to me is given below or within  the page: here)

- - -

Terms of usage can already encapsulate judgement - so as to 'interpret' all events, relations or communications to support a framework of judgement - which is a self-assertion of a narrative reality upon self-other and world.
I see that everyone always chooses what - in that moment - is the better or not the worse choice for them relative to the definitions they are judging or working from. Most of which are 'already hidden' as subconscious habit and unconscious or denied self.

I would say that you cannot judge but in the wish-belief to be the judge you can only judge the self you made - and ascribe it to self-inadequacies or guilts, to others and to the world and life or God. This IS to make a world in our own image unlike true Creation.

Self growth can mean anything - but in the sense of growing in capacity for honest relational recognition, balance and communication within our whole lives - (from out of a partial sense given to exclusivity) - yes it is the relinquishment or passing through of judgement that removes the block to the recognition of love (and I don't talk here of the substitute for love that passes as currency of manipulating intent).

The psychopathic blindness presumes the right to unfettered pursuit of happiness - in the terms set by the self he or she believe themselves to be - but is unwilling to engage introspection excepting to make a better weapon or mask of deceit by which to get.

Intellectual discussions about the need for judgement tend to be in the realm of validating, and rejecting - through the use of judgement - in terms of already accepted judgements.

Insofar as judging thought arises - one can be oblivious and let it run as if it is your mind, or one can notice it, watch it and see and feel what it is, where it is coming from, the purpose or intent it embodies and importantly... feel it - rather than let it tell you how to feel and therefore how to react.

Discernment is a gift of - or freely arising recognition - you may cover this with self-justifying judgement to 'maintain a sense of power and control' but the movement of being is not self-controlled from some presumption of 'outside self'. There is no such thing excepting virtually As If. So indeed the virtual self is at war within itself - and while we want it to be true we use it to block our native or natural awareness of our true being - by our own will and word. And so we have our reward and feel or experience the receipt of the thought of intent we give - according to the ideas and definitions we accept true of us.

Mind is inherently reflective - that is - whatever is held and accepted or given focus of desire, in awareness, goes forth to multiply as form, embodiment and be experienced, felt and known. "And He saw it was very Good!" is a sense of Self-recognition of perfectly aligned or unconflicted Creation.
The 'Prodigal Wasteland' is a reflection of no less perfectly reflected experience - of a segregative, conflicting and separating SENSE of self-specialness. AS IF - to take an inheritance from a Living Father so as to serve a separated virtual sense of self - experienced in place of Reality.

"I Am" can only be truly spoken and felt by true being - of a true Source. Listen within. For the term "I" can refer to awareness of Reality - in no way separate from all it beholds - or to the self-concept "I" through which all things are judged fitting and supportive - and so 'good' or unfitting and weakening or threatening - and so 'evil'. Lording it over Life is an oxymoron or self contradiction, but glorying in self-image is an image of self as primary, to which all else must conform or align in - or be denied and punished as if to 'correct' the form - as if the form is the true meaning or had built in and fixed meaning.

A world of 'correctness' is a coercive deceit in which hollow forms are joylessly sacrificing to such tyranny.

The Tree of a true knowing is not rejecting of itself - in order to possess for itself - and thus become possessed or blocked by mind of judgement.

If one observes and thus recognizes and accepts that to EVERY action there is an equal but opposite reaction, then it is one's own receiving and giving that must be brought into a light of honest account - for it is what you accept as the meanings arising from the definitions of any situation - that is your life - and the basis from which you live and therefore give or demonstrate.

If coming from a fearful or hateful self-belief or intent - no matter how well hidden or disguised - then only fruit in like kind can  result.  That you have capacity to accept hatred is the capacity to refuse it - but you will not refuse that which seems power or protector to your self - and so a willingness to enquire and feel into what is moving - while it is moving - instead of being triggered into reaction automatically. To use the ability of control to operate on the action resulting from conflicted feeling and thought - so as to allow awareness to 'rise' as a calmer mind allows - in which to discern or know and feel who you are in the "I Am" by yielding the self-concept and all its conflict to a FRESH take in place of a mis-take. Wholeness of being is 'already' moving - but a fragmented mind engages and diverts attention within its OWN version of 'self', relationship and reality. To notice anew is to feel 'connected' again in the living - restored to a felt quality of wholeness in which a sense and support for how to be in the situation at hand is implicit. Until the habit of "going it alone" or managing within a sense of isolation or un-supportedness - triggers the defence mechanism as if a natural focus.

A lack of love is not in itself an existence or true being - but it can be given a sense of autonomy through fear, guilt and denial.
A lack of love can therefore mask itself as anything and everything - and seem to run the world. The investment in hating evil - as each judges it to be for them - is the core identification by which to assert a limiting or denying sense of segregative self - apart from and OTHER to the hated, feared or shameful sense of reality - of self. This is the 'power to separate' - or the nature of separation trauma. But it is a deceit - because what is denied or pushed away remains with us - but manifests in ways we wont recognize because - in a sense - we swore never to un-hide the act by which to seem to live a life WE our self judge or control so as to limit a sense of total loss of self. Is such 'thinking' not our first born son? Is the willingness to release it in desire for truth the way of receiving gift of all that is true in what we made?

"The holiest of all the spots on earth is where an ancient hatred has become a present love".

In Reply to:


When it comes to self growth "Seeing Other People As The Problem Is The Problem".
This is probably more than an ego or flight or fight mental and emotional habit. The perception of distance like here and over there reinforces separateness and singularity. The more our actions differ, the more distance we see between us and them. If we are of one mind, the more we say they are like us and cooperation trumps and suspends competitiveness. To blame is to see a large distance from where they are, as to where I perceive myself to be (or desire to be).
According to biblical scripture we are discouraged from judging others. This however is impossible using the fight or flight mechanism of survival.
To protect your child, and thereby encourage the best possible outcomes for happiness, you make a judgement that a pedophile would make a poor choice as a babysitter for your child. Without any condemnation your judgement is both protective and wise. But judgement moves from the temporary and flexible (your feelings may change someday), to the rigid and permanent (condemnation or hatred) if your child has been hurt in such a manner. So judgement may be justified to avoid hurt, repair, inconvenience and blame as guilt or hate (regret).
Years ago I read about an exercise to suspend hate and limit judgement. It simply involved saying to yourself "I AM THAT" whenever you looked upon another person and garnered a quick superficial judgement about what you saw or felt about them. It is an exercise in eliminating distance and singularity.
The thief, the killer, the rapist, the liar, the cheater, the prostitute, the drug addict, the poor father, the broke, the disheartened and the destitute, all things THAT I AM, not just capable of under the >same< circumstances, but AM, as there is only oneness and therefor no difference or distance, as both space and time change everything!

"No tree has branches so foolish as to fight amongst themselves"

If one believes that to EVERY action there is an equal but opposite reaction, then those with the greatest deplorable, disgusting, habits and challenges in life, may also be the worlds greatest assets.
Those therefor that hate may also be those most capable of expressing love in proportion?


Psychopathic hate follow-up

Further commentary within the page:
Why Are There So Many Psychopaths in Positions of Power?

To Wayne's response to my comment to Jo below:

I warn against identifying in or being controlled by hate.The assertion of identity is invested in attachment to self-definitions that are forms of demand for things to be a certain way - or deliver a specific outcome - as a sense of control or power over life. But such identity is different from being identified perfectly within a greater sense of communication and relationship, for it is rigid and fixed as opposed to receptive and flowing.

The mutually agreed definition of a fenced in defence - as the sense of right and power of self - is fundamentally a war mind of 'conditional love' in which certain conditions are set to be met so as not to elicit hateful reaction or outcome - and the undercurrent struggle to win rather than lose position operates by deceit as a hateful agenda - for it seeks 'self' at EXPENSE of other while masking in forms of manipulative intent.

To truly see hate working our mind is to recognize you are not IT. But hate operates a mind of defences of every kind by which to validate itself and justify its hate as righteous or necessary power. Guilt and blame is the currency of such a mind and seems to be our only leverage of power or manipulation of it - in oneself or upon another.

I am suggesting that this is a fundamental mistake from which a destructive and hateful outcome is assured  - indefinitely and repetitively. I am not suggesting that love among equals requires you to be a doormat. Live your life, extend your presence, be the communication that is true of you - fully - and as an honouring of the presence and communication of others.

The fear of OTHER is part of the fixed identity. Expanding and embracing cultural differences is a process of willingness and communication. Sudden exposures to multiple OTHERNESS can freak out - or revert the mind to fight or flight mode - in which communication is lost to a primitive survival response.

When survival instinct is invested with hatred - it becomes extremely destructive to self, other and world. Responsibility is to waking up! - or the outsourcing and fighting over blame keeps us in division, conflict, pain and darkness with false 'lights' of rightness or victory over and against false assignments of evil to the intent of others.

Blame and hate FEELINGS come up to be healed or undone to a healed perspective. If you hate and blame hate and blame feelings - you ensure that NEVER will healing reach you. You have to be responsible for honestly feeling what you feel and finding what is true for you - or not. Of course others can held and certain situations can align helpfully - but first there has to be the stirring of desire for freedom from self-hate and its futility. For we first hate our self and life in some way that then projects out. It did not align to what we believed we wanted - and guess what - everyone and everything else is mostly to blame - or in psychopathic terms, totally blamed.

- - -

Power elitists 'play' their respective compliant populations. They operate 'narrative identity'.
Unless one recognizes the operative 'identity' - one is run by it - and it runs to keep darkness defended against light.
If anti-semitism isn't constantly refuelled - the Jewish identity would fade to national integration. That is not to be allowed - and so the deep fear that everyone ELSE will turn upon you and kill you is kept never too far away. Such fears operate beneath rational thinking - as every advertiser and propagandist knows.
I recommend you beware of hatred - and its capacity to likewise trigger reaction from unconscious fear. Perhaps recognizing the lie of a false identity uncovers a self-hatred that few are willing to pass through - whatever their cultural background.
But instead of projecting it away onto OTHER - we can recognize a lack of love in our mind that calls for healing and not for stamping out or scapegoating onto the OTHER. So whether you are paid to inflame hate or part of a zombie army - Jewish identity politics is different from any kind of Jewish - Semitic or otherwise - inheritance.
And humanity suffers from false identification that power-seekers (on all levels) exploit and nurture - so it's up to you to check in with more honesty than your conditioning will allow you to open to. Hate is blind and I could say, psychopathic.

In reply to:
 Jo Syphus who said to the main article:

Those aren't psychopaths, just regular jews

Psychopathic power

Why Are There So Many Psychopaths in Positions of Power?


True Cause - at one with its Effect

We must recognize that singe events have multiple causes.

Lab-grown meat

Execution at Happy Farm
Which world would be better: one in which all meat is grown in a lab or one which still contains humanely farmed animals?

The divine fire of Philip K Dick’s religious visions

The divine fire of Philip K Dick’s religious visions

The comment box for this article was titled "Are religious visions best understood in terms of mental illness?"

My Comment:

Individuals 'best understand' anything in terms that work for them and this of course depends on their accepted and active self definition. Some define emotional and mental dysfunctions as a result of relational communication breakdowns as 'mental illness' for their own reasons and others have such put upon them - along with forced medications etc.

Our experience can be defined and limited by conceptual identities that deny other perfectly valid but socially tabboo realms of consciousness - in fact consciousness is effectively taboo to expand or awaken as - EXCEPT as one's societal conditioning allows.

The opening into a realm of Meaning that cannot be meaningfully translated into our current conceptual grasp is often associated with a conflicted identity - where the new perspective is not established, grounded or integrated and the personality loses balance and experiences conflicted and fragmenting purpose - in fear, in self guilt and projected blame. But the dis-ease is primarily in the conflict that such expansion reveals - for it was already latent but did not show significant symptoms within the reality agreements of the social norm - that shares such conflicts and normalizes them.

Experience does not have to be labelled 'religious' or 'illness' just because it doesn't fit the official reality consensus. 'Bleedthroughs' of Soul connections or exchanges of information are part of a multidimensionality from which a filtered conscious self-sense operates above - and generally unconscious of - in part from the identification with a continuity narrative.

Dick' account shows that 'a sense of loss of such experience of Meaning - left a contrasting meaninglessness in which he at least temporarily became suicidally depressed. It might be said that his lack of awareness did not mean a lack of support in his continuing existence and Phillip K Dick - for his personality level was not the authorizer of ending his life - though in some sense it may have been the covering over of the 'numinous'.

It is noticable that the opening into Mind or Consciousness is often traumatic and yet also beatific and the former can be a confusion of awe with terror - for the 'mind' of our personality cannot understand in its own limited terms - yet can stand under in terms of receiving guidance and support for the integration of consciousness within Consciousness - for there are no walls or distances in the non-physical so much as vibrational frequencies of focus that allow an experience of separate self sense as part of the extended self sense - and the idea non physical and non-temporal Soul extending into multiple realities at once and yet embracing all of them as one is not yet given general acceptance - but insofar as truth is in any case the case - the linkages between apparently diverse elements - when exposed to our 'waking' awareness - become part of the anomalies in search of a narrative embrace or conscious acceptance - or more likely pushed down and away in the protective gesture of re-asserting the established identity; the 'devil we know' or think we know and thus believe as a sense of self control amidst... Infinity?

It should be noted that what is normal in our world is far from sane. Of course insanity can be redefined as sane - and must be if it is not to be immediately addressed. Whereas the recognition of insanity paradoxically witnesses the opening of a context of sanity from which to recognize the mis-identification. For some this can occur via dramatic experiences - for others in a relatively smooth transitional series of steps. But insanity - as a denial of a prior or true nature - cannot actually persist without dependency upon the very nature it denies to seem to exist - and this is active as a self-destructive pattern in human endeavour today - as it was under dictate of the Roman State. They used the modified form of the Christian religion to 'unify' a diverse Empire while 'sanctifying' state power - which decreed what was and was not sane or acceptable via the masking of religious controls.

This can also be seen in the individual who demands or asserts such as to stop or deny or limit any feared or unwanted change to their thought system or sense of self-control. Most of which is a form of limiting and denying validity to Consciousness - excepting where it supports the current need.

But a true self-acceptance meets the true need. Denial of feelings and thoughts is against the grain as a persistent strategy and leads to breakdown as a means to health - for a true foundation is fundamental to any degree of consciousness and the more unified in purpose, the more scope and richness of experience - aka 'Life more abundant'.

The mark of the Beast?

Why Is There Suddenly Such A Huge Push For ‘Mark Of The Beast’ Technology?

The Beast rises up from the Deep...
The patterns of deceit by which a coercive sense of control over a separated sense of Life are coming up into awareness.
That which 'operated' in the 'dark' or the deep of Unconsciousness is being illuminated.
What is this but our core separation trauma - and its immediate reactive 'mind' of fragmentation and struggle for power of control and position?
The human conditioning has never not been active in our known or even dimly remembered mythic history - being the "fall" or rather the belief, identity and defensive protection of the "separation" - which is active in belief and story but not in the actual capacity or gift of existence awareness.
The 'mind' that has been a sense of power and protection is relative to the fragmentation that formed to NOT KNOW what was then overwhelming - and the fear of loss of control, loss of self, loss of power and so forth is the trigger of a survival mentality that could be called 'reptilian' or primitive - being an subconscious fight or flight response for specific occasions within the experience of physical reality. However in the "Control" mentality it becomes the defacto "mind" that looks out on food . ammo. ally or threat - no matter what is actually present - and even comes to believe its existence depends on propagating enmity and division - and hence obfuscation and darkness - so as to "survive". Except this operates a self and other-destructive agenda (as the tares amidst the wheat) which bring pain, deprivation, misery and death - along with the potential to PAUSE from reaction and question the beliefs and core definitions that bring such repeated experience - rather than persist in what actually does not and cannot really work.

The key to take from what I feel to offer here is that you cannot expect or make anyone ELSE release their 'control' mentality or fearful sense of self-definition, but you can PAUSE from thought or behavioural reaction to NOTICE more of what is going on beneath your own thinking and perception - and the behaviours that then seem automatic or 'natural' to such a sense of personal opportunity or threat - but which are embodying and supporting a fearful script from which a fearful world reflects - even if done in a wish or intention of being 'kind or loving'. One has to look to the very foundation in a true willingness for Life - as an embrace and embracing quality of communication and relationship.

The escalation of 'control' technologies, is the SAME as the rising of the sense of UNCONTROLLABLE-NESS, but a relationship of honouring communication does not require external coercive controls to find balance and harmony in all its parts.
The nature of control needs to relinquish the hateful and focus in control against the allowing of hateful reaction. PAUSING the 'machine mind' to allow creative perspective to restore integrity.

Whatever your 'mind' tells you, your choice or acceptance of foundation is the determiner of the world you meet. If you are tricked by reaction, this becomes the re-education of vigilance against trickery WITHIN yourself. Once you begin to awaken your own 'inner' sense of Sonship (of Life) and brotherhood (in Life), you naturally operate a in supportive and protective way for others as your self in a wholeness of being - rather than feeding the TROLL of conflict, born of lack of love,that operates guilt, hate, and deceits of masked agenda in which trust is lost to a manipulative intent.

The true presence of you is like the Sun - in that it may be covered over with clouds - and yet remains un-coverable to a true desire. True desire is the 'enemy' of a control system - so in order to wake yourself, you have to open from it in a genuine willingness - as you are moved. For we are moved truly - but denied that to allow only what seemed 'safe' to be seen in.

Hating and fearing the 'controllers' or manipulators is only feeding their identity-fragment as part of keeping the state of isolation in which such identities seem meaningful or necessary. As Earth moves out of 'quarantine' a multi-dimensional quality of Existence renders the currency of 'control' increasingly or even suddenly redundant - though perhaps if this IS entangled with your heart's desire - you may live its 'lordship' in some way as to recognize its lack of fulfilment. Nothing external can truly fulfil that which is itself programmed by a sense of deprivation and lack. Everything stolen, steals your Peace - by your own word is it so - and not at the hand of another.

Being moved is the nature of the focusing within consciousness - and what we accept or choose to be moved by or FROM is the most fundamental freedom or indeed waking responsibility unto ourself and unto all. Balance does not arise from the carrot and stick - but if we recognize our own choice for carrot and stick 'mind' operates the denial of the true movement of our being - then we can leave the choice for carrot and stick like un-taken bait, and be open to the movement of being that is associated with guidance and support from WITHIN - that also communicates through synchronicities of what seems 'without'.

Though I write with words and ideas - the willingness to yield WITHIN is wordless or simple and requires no change to first occur. Regardless the terms you do or don't have or use for your true being - it embraces you perfectly but only to your willingness will your desire rise in the clear. And even so it comes into a mind that is habituated to exploit, attack and usurp - yet only scripts itself as having 'lost it' or been cut off in some way. Separation trauma rise from self-concept or rigidly mind-framed sense of self. As long as one persists the condition of separation and rejection, does the reflected denial seem to come back at us in distressing disguises.

There is within us, a re-integrative movement of being - because there has been a set into a segregative imposition upon the movement of being. healing and wholeness is not an overcoming of enemy so much as a yielding to true alignment. One may meet great resistance to such in oneself and therefore manifest conflict, drama and heartbreak - before arriving at a simplicity of vision and choice - in which the 'choiceless' moves spontaneously of itself - without reference to a negative in terms of self justification or apology. Such witness to Life is joy - it all or any form of expression.

Don't just do something - STAND there - and know intimately the movement of being that embraces and inspires a free willing response or creativity - as a unifying purpose of joy - and not a coercive attempt to impose or assert form - 'that doth the winged Life destroy...'.
Let the roles be played out that ARE serving your awakening perspective - and be found in the Living rather than counted among the dead - and perhaps your simple and perhaps thought-less witness stirs those who had so deeply forgotten that they have a true belonging in a greater Intimacy of being - than the mind of itself can believe or conceive true - even here - and now.

- - -

Ah but is it the heart's witness to truth or a self-commentary from one who presumes to be above his brother?
Not all who cry "Lord Lord!" are recognizable in truth.
The word in the heart is usurped by the framing of a form-obsessed mind. Or rather - it is written indelibly - but covered over with much ado about... something that seems so necessary in its timing - in its framing - in its self-assertiveness. Calm the storm and know truly.

In Reply to:
wayne - who wrote:

Jesus writes His name on your heart. Satan writes his name on your forehead. One by willingness, the other by force.
In the past, bullets and food decided who lived and who died, but soon that will be decided electronically at the stroke of a finger, all in the name of security and convenience.
Ironically billions will only find death secured and highly inconvenient, but.........isn't technology wonderful? And besides, you did ask for it and will embrace it with death defying excitement and anticipation I'll bet!
Concise article although sad that its coming.


Everything is connected in You

Jon Rappoport writes on ‘what is the Matrix’

I don't agree with the way he frames his communication:

My response:

There is a misunderstanding here. The matrix is the mind that pretends to disconnect - and claims that 'individuality' is a power unto itself and thinks IT has and can exploit imagination at will - but becomes trapped within its own definitions in a world of separate and oppositional polarities.

So it is not that all the separate ones or things are connected - but that they are never truly separate or disconnected from the Imagination in which they arise.
That sense of disconnect and power over a part of the game of identifying with the character of the dream as if the dream is not Your separation experience of the Wholeness (though it hasn't got a name because there is no one and nothing OUTSIDE to make an object of it. Or be an object to It.
Clearly something is arising as experience and the nature of that is always an expression of what YOU are defining yourself in relation to your world. It is a dance in which the one has experience of differentiation of partial and unique perspective and Infinitely so.

Humpty never truly fell. But the belief runs on. You don't need to put him together again - but merely to open to the Source of your being by NOT struggling with or from a false premise and making it real for you thereby.
There is a reintegrating movement to a fragmented sense of being and your do recognize yourself more directly, more intimately and more expansively as a result of re-alignment within who you truly are rather than struggling from a basis that is not the true of you.

But one cannot talk this true. The experiencing of what we are as we are is part of allowing new perspective in - which indeed can be seen as a Life serving free willing creative imagination that embodies in active willingness to live from what is revealed rather than make an identity to then try to sell or validate on others. For one of the ways we do not let healing in is to run off with some of the forms of insight before we have really let them become in us.

Nothing exists without the rest of All That Is. Give me anything that has independent existence - for there is no such thing! - yet the wish-belief to BE such a one must colour all else likewise.

Everything - and much more than we are currently or consciously aware of is an expression or embodiment of Existence. Existence itself is dimensionless and contains infinite dimensions - which include awareness of existing - and that is where you are - whether you recognize this is what you are, or prefer to identify in your own terms. They don't actually change what you are - but they do create a focus of experience. Your experience is not a punishment or vengeance - but such ideas have found receptivity and acceptance in your mind and so you are liable to receive or interpret in the measure you have given out.

Show me anything you can experience that is outside your consciousness... Show me one thing you can experience that you cannot imagine... Yet you can experience an expansion of scope so as to appreciate a richer and more intimate sense of whatever it is you are accepting focus in.

It is the 'ego' sense that is not connected to anything - and makes up meanings that redefine the Living into a slave or as stuff to exploit and lay to waste. This thing seeks dominion and to determine judgement and definition and control over instead of extending recognition of worth. It is a weird 'creation' that has no independent existence because it rides on your determination to have it your OWN way at expense of others. This is self-contradicting but seems to make sense within its own framing. But makes nonsense of who you truly are.

It is a hopeless futility to try to create a 'positive' upon a negation of your self/Life and then assert that in place of who you are. But having done so - you can yield this imaged identifiction of 'self' to your Source and all that is true floats to the top while all that is false falls away unwanted. Why? Because you want freedom, joy, peace and the quality of love to rise freely in you because that is who you are and who you recognize yourself to be.

What about the evil shit then?
That which does not fall away untrue still has your allegiance and support. You are still getting something you think you want from it and even if 'hidden in your unconscious - it remains active until you check it out and become clear instead of hiding in what used to seem to work.
While hatred is active - love will be killed or denied - unless you move the hatred within a willingness to be healed of it . Under rage is hate and under hate is hurt. Hurt is a heart thing. It hurts in the heart. The mind attempts to displace and redistribute pain. Doesn't work. Re vision. Look anew. Be honest with your feelings - denied feelings turn dark. It takes whatever it takes but as the silly ad says - You're worth it... because you Exist. Not because you deserve or are unworthy in the terms you made up and believed. Because you Exist. There's a connection that can be overlaid with narrative - but remains unchanged. And you can Feel this here and now whenever you take off you mind and be exactly this.


Backing the wrong horse?

How I Know for Sure I am Not Yet Enlightened

The above article looks for certainty in a negative and then seeks to use that as a positive.

My comment:

A false belief does not require work to lose its currency of usefulness. If you assert the untrue as if true - that is very different from accepting the false as if true - and has its own underlying beliefs as to what you get out of choosing to persist in a knowing 'lie'.

As someone pointed out the personal enlightenment is an oxymoron or self-contradiction. Self contradiction is the device of the mind which can believe and follow what is not true or out of true in allegiance to something valued above true - or usurping true - whereby the false thinking operates to deny true recognition - while believing itself right in its judgements.

To be sure that you are not enlightened is a strange 'knowledge' to be certain in claiming as true. Is a certainty of being felt and known in ANY claim of self-defined identity?
The lack of any claim or conclusion of self allows a receptivity or conductivity for Life to be itself and recognize itself in its own terms. A true sense of unalloyed worth extends to all and recognizes itself in all. Only the mind creates the definitions and narratives of unworthiness relative to self image or concept - and so seeks to find validation or the means to become 'worthy' - which only reinforces the original mis-idenification.

Acceptance of who you are - or the movement that is being Everything right where you are, is adding nothing and taking nothing away from what is already true - which arises naturally from releasing the investment in forms of identification that operate denial.
In that sense the willingness to know nothing and find or be found in beginner's mind opens a receptivity that presumed knowledge blocks, filters or distorts. Every moment is a new beginning - or rather a fresh appreciation. IF the mind comes in - does it have to be given a negative role? Or can it be noticing the mind?

The feeling of Existence knows itself being - and wherever I am is defined in any differentiation from the primary quality of existence, I has experience in terms of that self-definition. When we are aligned with our true nature, we are identified perfectly - with no 'identity struggle' for validation, apology or justification. To be certain of identity struggle is to stop the messenger from delivering the message by persisting in the conditions where communication cant get through.

Self conflict, disease, denial and deceit

What you’ll never read about virus-research fraud: The rabbit hole
by Jon Rappoport

 The article is about deceits masking as science and indicates how once a story of false association can be got to 'stick' - other leverage can use that false premise without being challenged.

I wrote with reflections on the nature of such misidentification and its undercurrent patterns of self-conflicted misalignment and imbalance.

Mis-identity operates by false association. From false premise logic proceeds automatically.
It wont seem like logic if the premise is insane. Un-owned and un-healed fear operates contagion of self-replicating patterning - though it can mutate or shift form and trigger infection by reactions that then validate false premise. But a sense of lack will go forth and multiply lack. An abundance of lack. Why not play a different movie, now we see how powerful is the Projector to magnify and share whatever we hold desire and focus in?

Whereas mistakes can be inadvertently followed until feedback uncovers and corrects, deceitful manipulation looks for opportunity to leverage an already active fear or guilt, by offering a displacement of the inner conflicted relational breakdown, to an outer agency of 'causation' - this relieves the fearful one of personal responsibility in large part because the cover story is an authority that can not only diagnose, but treat - or at least manage the 'dis-ease' in such a way as to to minimise or block its effects or symptoms and claim efficacy. This then proceeds to invalidate anything that would expose the ruse - because the underlying core issue is of the drive to deny and 'escape' extreme and intolerable inner conflict by asserted pretence and denial that is both coercive and manipulative in the name of survival relative to overwhelming experience that cannot in its timing find resolution.

The coercive mind of manipulation 'is' the matrix - and attracts and aligns ('bands') with corresponding vibratory match in others - as well as attracting and reinforcing itself by filtering or blocking any other channel of communication.

Holding contradictory premises involves very fast shifting back and forth between unrelated or opposing premises of self in such a way as to present a unifying continuity narrative - that is operating as a cover story for the engaging and protecting of a compartmentalized attention - which includes the notion of a private mind and symbolizes itself as the seemingly autonomous 'body' that it regards as limiting it and separating it from All That Is.

Giving priority of focus to the presentation of face - or front - bands 'conscious experience' and blind-siding what must not be acknowledged or shown bands those facets of self-experience as 'unconscious'. The acting out upon body of believed 'separation needs' arise from assertive self-concept over a wholeness - a wholeness that has set itself into a fragmented loss of identity by summoning all the king's horses and all the king's men - which operates as the denial of the feeling being and of the sense-expression of body in balance - as well as the core function of blocking creative imagination - which is in a sense blamed for the mess as a self/god of good/evil who must be sacrificed to and appeased so as to stay the hand of vengeance or rage and allow some crumbs of comfort by which a tiny sense of self can 'survive' and in its own tiny framework focussed in as 'the world' prevail as a power of like kind.

A schizophrenic god with psychopathic personality facets... God and self are different frequency tags of the same idea - but the coercive denial implicit in self-concept - as an exclusive oppositional power or capacity - divides and rules out true balance in seeking only reinforcement and conformity to its self-premise - and it feels denied, betrayed, rejected and abandoned - with all the corresponding imprints of rage and fear - that are themselves denied and pushed back and down into the body - and reflecting as every kind of assault or affliction upon the body, whose original nature is covered over by layers and layers of defence of such fragmented complexity that the human conditioning is taken as a reality-premise. And the few who challenge or uncover it meet the same core intolerable separation trauma as ever - because it has not found a way to come up and be healed or undone of its false premise.

However, sickness is a crisis of healing for it is at root a call for help that often seeks only where it cannot be found - or for pre-set limited help with removing symptoms without requiring any transformation or awakening perspective of corrected error. And in extreme forms as the usurping of disease by pre-empting its own fear by sacrificing life before any disease has in fact occurred.
Mistakes can be inadvertently followed until feedback reveals the mistake - but the hatred of life that runs in the 'back' uses such dark pathways to effect the pushing down and denying of life.
The unworthy population becomes the scapegoat of disease and limiting the symptoms operates population 'control' agenda. This wont be said up front - but just back a bit is the boardroom meeting and the networking of 'concern' that 'sees' the problem as it really is and pre-empts total chaos and loss with surgical sacrifice of any proportion but that the 'power to prevail and protect its power' persists.

 The jack in the box comes up with all the force it is pushed down. But the force is not in conflict when you recognize it is all your own. The need to box in or box off from by force, is different from simply tuning into what you want and attracting it in thought word and deed as your own creative discovery. There is no conflict in doing what you truly want. But conflicts come up to be recognized and undone. A lack of worthiness in a sense of denial and wrongness of self masking as if to 'right' itself only persists the original belief in lack of self. Don't look to concept for the living - be moved - be receptive to being moved and regain a trust of balancing within all that you are - which is always more than any idea or image.


Infinite And Individual

Reality is not immortal
by Jon Rappoport

My comment to Jon's article on the power of Individual imagination:

Presuming to judge 99.999% of spiritual 'systems' (oxymoron warning!) - or in fact presuming to judge another - is a use of the imagination for the purpose of asserting a 'rightness' over and against a 'wrongness'.

Why not use Imagination to communicate without resort to ascribing the bad, ignorant or evil to 'Others or Them? Why not uncover and address the underlying beliefs and use story to illuminate how the ruse works in each 'mind' subscriber.

The stories enacted as our world are narrative realities and if you experience your part of such - then it is valid for you to learn and grow through - including the recognition that self-definitions and supporting narrative operate your current 'reality' perspective - and so uncovering these opens the true power to choose or focus from a wider perspective than the triggered or conditioned reactions to such 'reality experience' dictate.

There is no need to DIS anything that is ultimately PART OF your greater Imagination and therefore YOU. In fact the attempt to eradicate or get rid of unwanted self is the way to recycle and KEEP it. That is why J said 'resist ye not evil' - for what you resist persists in manifesting within your reality experience. But what you 'put or leave behind you' as a result of focussing wholly in what you both WANT and recognize within yourself is left unused - excepting insofar as it served to set up a scope or spectrum of experience within which to awaken at a perspective both infinite and individual - both - and at once.

There is no individual outside and apart from the infinite - but only an idea of autonomous personality - which is confusing the brush with the Painter.
In alignment with awakened joy we are 'on purpose' and 'get out of our own way' so as to let into and channel or facilitate the embodiment of truly Felt Self - rather than the filtering distortions of a self-assertive 'getting' mechanism.

Though I have some critical commentary to the way Jon frames some of his ideas - I celebrate THAT these areas are brought into the open where we can reflect, recognize and reintegrate from a true foundation - that can only be uncovered. It cannot merely be asserted or believed or bought or sold into slavery.


True Foundation

Know Thyself!
Until you know yourself you are operating out of false premises. What can you then expect!
The blaming mind of good-bad is not a reliable guide – or rather leads into reliance on a compulsive or driven behaviour under an authoritarian or coercive ‘will’.
The true/false IS a true guide. But – it takes one to know one – and the opening of a true foundation is the Beginning – (and the way – and the end – if allowing a foundation then brings forth in like fruit).

An insane confusion under false premises ‘manifests’ a straight-jacket, a prison-planet, a destructive intent masking in positive terms, a mind-trap, a splitting ‘mind’ that blocks the original or true function of Mind.

Like vibrational frequencies are already one ‘level’ or ‘channel’. If you participate in fear-thinking you operate out from a fearfully defined sense of self. (Note I did not say honestly feeling fears when they arise and embracing them). The forms of the fear-thoughts may seem ‘positive’ but the effect will be segregative, separating, and disconnected experience of struggle.

When enough people (reinforcement) get stuck (in defining their experience in rigid and fixed terms) in the same place (identifying in struggle) – they call it ‘reality’.

As long as you deny or invalidate other choices you will still at some level be choosing them. You cannot ignore the effects of your subconscious and unconscious thoughts just because they are ‘out of mind’ or projected and associated with ‘THEM!” or ‘Others’. Or rather, you cannot forever deny yourself.

In reply to:
Manifesting What You Want


Self-conformity drawn from relational construct

Collectivism and engineered perception
by Jon Rappoport

My commenting:

Before you extrapolate to 'group' consider the 'relationship'. As the concept of a relationship is NOT the relating or living communication being shared. So the concept of the group.
The collective expression of infinite individuality is a synchronicity - BUT the conformity or fitting into ideas of 'self' as derived from the 'couple' or the group, or society - is a construct.

While ultimately this conformity is life-denying - for a relationship is only as alive as the life being brought to it - and if a conformity to a consensus reality denies such life - there is a hollow automaton in substitution for life - BUT the capacity to learn to balance within relationship is the creative expression of it.

An un-relational 'individuality' may be psychopathic - if 'otherness' has never been recognized as a gift of self-knowledge and acceptance or love.

Balancing the self, the other and Life is what Jesus points to in the two commandments ascribed to him but actually representing a core realisation. Life with an L being used for G-d because "God" has been so abused as a weapon and a masking of hidden and un-owned hate. Any form can be used to mask 'hidden' meanings.

The core foundation that embodies Sanity is not manufactured by any act or thought or imagination - being Cause of the capacity to imagine, think and act. And so a false foundation is a false framing of true Cause - such as separation trauma with which we are all familiar - which is of course also the framework of 'mind-control' instead of mind-focusing freely.

Taking some of a Good Idea and going forth in righteousness is the getting of an identity AGAINST evil - and this is a deceit by which to hide fear and hate and yet mask it in the distortions of relationship and communication that then ensue.

You are your own Matrix!
But in your participation within deceit your in effect playing a kind of Pokeman Go! until you tire of it - for it can Never Be completed. How can you know if your are aligning truly or against your unique signature vibration of being - (your individuality)? By honestly feeling for dissonance in body, emotion and mind and noting what such dissonance is symptomatic of. But you can only be and grow the current level of integrity you have available to where you are at - by living From and As it.

The exclusive identification in an imagination seared or scorched into your unconscious and subconscious by overwhelming imbalance of terror and rage given Total Reality and therefore justification, is like a wound up spring that has set the complexity of the world of war... to operate a defence against knowing who you are.
Your Creation cannot be 're-Given' but you can release any other 'gift' you have given and so received so as to re-Member and be re-Minded. That Creation is Itself Creative is in the image of its Creator - for there is no limit of closed system upon the Infinite in Expression. Yet the idea of limits or closed off 'mind' is obviously a part of a much greater pallet through which to experience.

While negatively defined - the self is always seeking NOT to have certain experiences - or seeking other experience as a sense of power and protection from the hated or unwanted experience. But it is not enough to declare 'there is nothing wrong with me' while a core sense of dissonance operates to displace it onto 'Them' or 'others' or 'World'.

Lack of self-acceptance cannot but manifest as self-sabotaging thought and deed, or leak out as hatred in a cold and loveless 'analysis' of others - no matter what appeals its makes to 'reason' or 'love'.

Whatever your particular imprinted conditionings - and however they arose or came to be - they are the path through which to be restored to a free willingness. Not as 'something you have to do' - because your past is re-enacting itself in your day anyway, so being in the desire and awareness for the joys you otherwise discard - along with the rationalisations or beliefs by which you trash yourself or stay small so as to stay hidden, is a shift of focus away from the maintaining of your narrative continuity within the 'matrix' of a world deduced from fear, hate, rage and powerlessness.

There is no way to overcome the world - because it is not there to be overcome - unless you are creating that experience by buying into the belief. Ultimately the meanings you encounter are those that come forth from your own Word or definition - but one can only uncover what is ripe or ready to be uncovered and reintegrated.

Seekers think to find or add unto themselves. It is the opposite. be found, and be true founded in the capacity to abide in the true of you - even though the mind a -tempts to take over as a power unto itself. Put it down, rejoin the dance and leave it behind.

Of course this calls for the acceptance of true and the releasing of false. Where your heart is invested in the false, heartbreak is met. Rage is felt. But if you are free willing rather than will-denying - then this is where you allow the sting of hate to be given up as foundation for power that you do not want. That is why it is false. Because YOU do not want it and so it is not given power to run your life. Hence the uncovering to what Is your Life!


Matrix Conditioning

Further rejoinders in exploring

What is the Matrix?
by Jon Rappoport
From one point of view, the Matrix is a central block of energy that is fed by millions of loops and tubes of energy—and those loops are all human actions that follow a script called:
“The human condition” is a fake image of the limitations of human life, plus all the implications and melodramas that follow from it....

Just change the static – aggrieved-righteous judgement-based human ‘condition’ for ‘conditioning’.
No matter who did what to who – first or as a result – your conditioning pattern is yours by your acceptance and validation through acting out from the belief-interpretation at the time. Own it.
Or allow it to predicate your life and repeat the same imprinting over and over.

Finding resolution or indeed reintegration has been predicated on conditions that have to be met as the form of the way in which resolution can be accepted. But if the claim of being Right is released from the rage that has this as its core imprint – then imagination is allowed back in as the steps and pathways of a more truly aligned experience and communication of your Existence – which includes All That Is – but does not have to manifest what you don’t prefer. You do not have to focus on what has no resonance and relevance for you – and if you do – and are – then it HAS and it is up to you to discover what is going on in you – in your beliefs and definitions of self. And in your larger agreement to participate in a collective reality Earth – for the matrix by which form embodies meaning to reflect to recognition and expansion is the Creative un-separate from Creation.

The identity-need to be exclusively Right – conforms imagination to only find and allow pathways that support its conditioned pattern. Only this is “Reality” and imagination is invalidated or denied any other communication. Such “Reality” has conditioned us over millennia to split or fragment consciousness over and over and over in ways that manifest as blaming others or world for the underlying imprints that we also enact as the setting of those conditions – and cannot believe anything that exceeds them. It isn’t just that there are very complex negative interacting associations – but that the ‘territory’ involved is generally of the kind that we want OUT OF ASAP by whatever means possible – and so don’t get to abide there long enough to actually bring curiosity present.

You cannot think your way out of a mind-trap. You have to feel through to a perspective from which to shift to a reality the mind-set disallowed but which now can be lived from – believed in and recognised in reflected experience.
Feeling operates a quality and richness of information that thinking cannot reach or control – but can operate so as to deny, rule out, substitute for and demonize.

Denied denials; beneath the covert op

The Matrix Revealed - The Nature of the Covert Op.

Denied denials operate without conscious recognition or acceptance. So denied hate is actively operating to block, undermine and overcome anything that triggers its imprinting of 'enemy'.

What we tend to regard and presume as self, is a controlled narrative - operating revolving door personae of archetypal imprinting as a script by which to rule or unify a warring self within concept and image of self - as a limiting condition upon overwhelming fear of chaos, pain, loss, and powerlessness or annihilation.

The matrix of total identification within such a self and world, is served by the desire NOT to know - and operated by asserting and enacting a narrative 'self-defining' presumption of knowing in place of a true receptivity to know.
Hatred, terror, rage, and heartbreak are all forcefully usurping a receptive quality of relational balance - while they operate beneath the mask of self righteous and self-justified non-surrender. For the most natural act to being is hated and feared by the (hateful and fearful) intensity of self-survival in narrative terms.

The defence DOES what it claims to protect FROM.
The attempt to escape from an 'impossible situation' reinforces the belief in the reality of the narrative definition - and the survival in such terms becomes the 'rightness' over and against a need and desire to 'see' the WRONG or evil, weakness, lie, plot, heresy, in the OTHER - and upon the WORLD from which one's presence is withheld unless specific conditions are met - in which case a conditional 'love' is allowed.

Everyone's world is a reflection of an inner relation and communication - and each play parts or roles in each other's reflected inner conflict.
You - the truth of You - is not defined or confined by definitions from WITHOUT - excepting through a desire to hide or present yourself in such terms.
Surrender is a term of subjection to an other. But yielding to true receptive-expressive of being is the undoing of the spell of point-of-view within struggle to prevail.

The addiction-aversion identity as 'point-of-view' as if it were individuality is a static sense of self; a refusal of transformational perspective that feeds of an apparently incontrovertible external sense of evil for it righteousness, whilst reinforcing the matrix or framework of self - and reality - definition by which it 'escapes' its own exposure. Exposure of falsehood to true communication and relationship is undoing and healing. But the refusal to surrender 'point-of-view' operates an authoritarian dictate while sacrificing and appealing to symbols of Life in place of yielding unto the Life that gifts Itself freely and unconditionally to your Will, informing and emBodying the Light of your Heart's desire. The reversal of the Life operates denial and denial of denial operates illusion of life.

'Waking up' to a realisation that what was taken as self was a lid or cover-story over denied and feared self - is an honesty of being regardless the symptoms of terror, rage, hate or heartbreak and the mess that they have made of a movement for love that CAN now be felt stirring within this honesty of being. Notice the urge to regain unconsciousness in the projection of denial OUTSIDE yourself. Is this the power that it seems to promise? Or is this the sacrifice of true power to a god of UNreality that can only operate hate to 'save itself' from the Call to Live?

We all have a part in victim-hood and we all have a part in perpetration of hate; we all have share in 'mind' as substitute for true Willing and emotional manipulation as substitute for true relationship.

A 'substitute reality' for true being is not 'DONE to us' against our will - though 'mind' interprets our life in such a framing as the basis of our asserted 'right' to do likewise. We do NOT KNOW our own will - for the 'mind' operates denial and substitution. That was the function we employ it to fulfil - excepting we release our subscription and investment in such UN-fulfilling futility - in willingness for our true feeling and honest desire to move through us - and so to us - as a recognition, appreciation and gratitude for existence - for awareness of freedom from that awakens freedom to be - truly moved. True is You are. Conforming to a denial script hides what fear says you are - but fear can not recognize or truly see, know or embrace You - spinning off to its own logical confusion. But You - in your totality are the capacity to embrace fear - for You are not a 'mind' as fear limits and defines in frailty and littleness. But of course your experience is reflecting your acceptance of yourself in relation to your world. But the term 'you' is relative here - for within the matrix of denied denial, love - or acceptance - has no currency.

omaz050959 says: (To the main article)
It doesn’t have to be this way. Time we became the captain of our ships.

Mutineers and pirates consolidated to become the naval power of mercantile piracy writ large in global dominion and subjection. When Sovereignty is corrupted - each seeks its own plunder and pushes the other under - unless to use as an 'asset'.

So what is the nature of our purpose, each, by which to navigate by wind and tidings?

Wonder or plunder?

The matrix of the model of reality as operating at large reveals plunder by its wasteland and misery. Blaming THEM buys time in which to persist the self-same collective denial we 'love' to say we hate - whist in secret, perpetuate.

However, in joining with you I can say that no one else has the power to live your life for you - though you have and are the power to deny your power by 'seeing' it in others  and in your world. Bringing this choice to light is not trying to force an outcome - but illuminating the true nature of what is being chosen between. There cant really be a war between truth and illusion. Illusion battles only with itself. Freedom is a choice-less choice - but a falsely framed freedom must first have chosen to accept the framing - for what it wants to explore or experience thereby.

However, once en-tranced, every attempt to escape binds the spell tighter. But know that the surface or 'waking' reality is not at cognizant of what is actually being drawn into focus. It was made to operate a denial or substitute reality - along with its undercurrent or subconscious agenda.

Reflections of denied desire

Thankyou for reflections,
of a secret desire
of 'hide and hide in'.

and denying light,
to be.
As ruled within

A jealous god
Asserted Me.
Nothing new
Fixed Idea.

Came thus change,
An opposition,
War to regain
what never was
yet seems holy
now it's lost.

Hate made holy,
Whole made hateful,
Death the price.

Shattered love
made hostage
extruded to its
body package

Set within
By killing wholeness
'Me' to be.

But change,
to re-cognition.

from false

Reversed reversal,
the lie undone,
but not to raise
another one.

Wakened heart
to love embrace.
The moment moves,
and moving,

In true of being
ever new
to be the very
You of you

Because - just because!
Be Cause in motion.
No hate-feared other,
but free embrace
as movement freely
feels to know.

Embrace rejection's messenger
for what is pushed away is kept.
while hidden.

False can only seem
while dreaming,
victim to a dream,
you chose, then hid
in loveless world
or 'Them!'

In reply to:

Michael Burns